카테고리 아카이브 제품

Why is counter-current flow more efficient than parallel flow?

Counter-current flow (counterflow) is more efficient than parallel flow in heat exchangers because it maintains a larger and more consistent temperature difference (ΔT) between the two fluids throughout the exchanger, maximizing heat transfer. Here's a detailed explanation:

1. Temperature Gradient and Heat Transfer

  • Counterflow:
    • In counterflow, fluids flow in opposite directions (e.g., hot fluid enters at one end, cold fluid at the opposite end). This creates a nearly constant temperature difference (ΔT) along the entire length of the exchanger.
    • The hot fluid’s highest temperature (inlet) meets the cold fluid’s outlet, and the cold fluid’s lowest temperature (inlet) meets the hot fluid’s outlet. This allows the cold fluid to approach the hot fluid’s inlet temperature, maximizing heat transfer.
    • Example: If the hot fluid enters at 100°C and exits at 40°C, and the cold fluid enters at 20°C, it can exit close to 90°C, achieving a high heat transfer rate.
  • Parallel Flow:
    • In parallel flow, both fluids flow in the same direction, so the largest ΔT occurs at the inlet, but it rapidly decreases as both fluids approach similar temperatures along the exchanger.
    • The cold fluid’s outlet temperature cannot exceed the hot fluid’s outlet temperature, limiting the total heat transferred.
    • Example: If the hot fluid enters at 100°C and exits at 60°C, the cold fluid entering at 20°C may only reach ~50°C, resulting in less heat transfer.

Why it matters: Heat transfer rate (Q) is proportional to ΔT (Q = U × A × ΔT, where U is the heat transfer coefficient and A is the surface area). Counterflow’s larger and more consistent ΔT results in a higher average heat transfer rate, making it more efficient.

2. Log Mean Temperature Difference (LMTD)

  • The efficiency of a heat exchanger is often quantified using the Log Mean Temperature Difference (LMTD), which represents the average temperature difference driving heat transfer.
  • Counterflow: Has a higher LMTD because the temperature difference remains relatively constant along the exchanger. This allows more heat to be transferred for the same surface area.
  • Parallel Flow: Has a lower LMTD because the temperature difference drops significantly toward the outlet, reducing the driving force for heat transfer.
  • Result: For the same heat exchanger size, counterflow transfers more heat due to its higher LMTD, or it requires a smaller surface area to achieve the same heat transfer, making it more compact and efficient.

3. Maximum Heat Recovery

  • In counterflow, the cold fluid can theoretically reach the hot fluid’s inlet temperature (in an infinitely long exchanger), allowing near-complete heat recovery (e.g., 90–95% efficiency in modern designs like Holtop’s 3D cross-counterflow exchangers).
  • In parallel flow, the cold fluid’s outlet temperature is limited by the hot fluid’s outlet temperature, capping efficiency (typically 60–80%). This makes counterflow ideal for applications like energy recovery ventilation or industrial processes where maximum heat recovery is critical.

4. Practical Implications

  • Counterflow: The consistent ΔT reduces the required heat transfer area, leading to smaller, more cost-effective designs for high-performance applications. It’s widely used in HVAC, industrial cooling, and energy recovery systems.
  • Parallel Flow: The rapid decrease in ΔT requires a larger heat transfer area to achieve comparable heat transfer, increasing material and space requirements. It’s used in simpler, less efficiency-critical applications like basic radiators or educational setups.

Visual Explanation (Simplified)

  • Counterflow: Imagine a hot fluid (100°C to 40°C) and a cold fluid (20°C to 90°C). The temperature difference stays relatively high (e.g., ~20–60°C) across the exchanger, driving efficient heat transfer.
  • Parallel Flow: The same fluids start with a large ΔT (100°C – 20°C = 80°C) but quickly converge (e.g., 60°C – 50°C = 10°C), reducing the driving force and limiting efficiency.

Conclusion

Counter-current flow is more efficient because it sustains a larger and more consistent temperature difference (ΔT) along the exchanger, resulting in a higher LMTD and greater heat transfer for the same surface area. This makes it the preferred choice for applications requiring high efficiency, such as energy recovery or industrial processes, while parallel flow is simpler but less effective, suited for less demanding applications.

Counterflow heat exchanger vs parallel flow

Counterflow and parallel flow heat exchangers are two primary configurations for heat transfer between two fluids, differing in the direction of fluid flow and their impact on efficiency, temperature profiles, and applications. Below is a concise comparison based on their design, performance, and use cases.

1. Flow Configuration

  • Counterflow Heat Exchanger:
    • Fluids flow in opposite directions (e.g., hot fluid enters at one end, cold fluid at the opposite end).
    • Example: Hot fluid flows left to right, cold fluid flows right to left.
  • Parallel Flow Heat Exchanger:
    • Fluids flow in the same direction (e.g., both hot and cold fluids enter at the same end and exit at the opposite end).
    • Example: Both fluids flow left to right.

2. Heat Transfer Efficiency

  • Counterflow:
    • Higher efficiency: Maintains a larger temperature difference (ΔT) along the entire length of the exchanger, maximizing heat transfer per unit area.
    • Can achieve up to 90–95% thermal efficiency in well-designed systems (e.g., plate or tube exchangers).
    • The outlet temperature of the cold fluid can approach the inlet temperature of the hot fluid, making it ideal for applications requiring maximum heat recovery.
  • Parallel Flow:
    • Lower efficiency: The temperature difference (ΔT) is highest at the inlet but decreases rapidly as both fluids approach thermal equilibrium along the exchanger.
    • Typically achieves 60–80% efficiency, as the cold fluid’s outlet temperature cannot exceed the hot fluid’s outlet temperature.
    • Less effective for applications needing near-complete heat transfer.

3. Temperature Profile

  • Counterflow:
    • Temperature gradient is more uniform, with a near-constant ΔT across the exchanger.
    • Allows for a closer approach temperature (the difference between the hot fluid’s outlet and cold fluid’s inlet temperatures).
    • Example: Hot fluid enters at 100°C and exits at 40°C; cold fluid enters at 20°C and can exit close to 90°C.
  • Parallel Flow:
    • Temperature difference is large at the inlet but diminishes along the exchanger, limiting heat transfer as fluids reach similar temperatures.
    • Example: Hot fluid enters at 100°C and exits at 60°C; cold fluid enters at 20°C and may only reach 50°C.

4. Design and Complexity

  • Counterflow:
    • Often requires more complex piping or plate arrangements to ensure fluids flow in opposite directions, potentially increasing manufacturing costs.
    • Compact designs are possible due to higher efficiency, reducing material requirements for the same heat transfer rate.
  • Parallel Flow:
    • Simpler design, as both fluids enter and exit at the same ends, reducing piping complexity.
    • May require a larger heat transfer area (longer or bigger exchanger) to achieve comparable heat transfer, increasing size and material costs.

5. Applications

  • Counterflow:
    • Preferred in applications requiring high efficiency and maximum heat recovery, such as:
      • HVAC systems (e.g., energy recovery ventilators).
      • Industrial processes (e.g., chemical plants, power generation).
      • Wastewater heat recovery (e.g., shower heat exchangers).
      • Cryogenic systems where precise temperature control is critical.
    • Common in plate heat exchangers, double-pipe exchangers, and high-performance shell-and-tube designs.
  • Parallel Flow:
    • Used in applications where simplicity is prioritized, or where complete heat transfer is not critical, such as:
      • Small-scale cooling systems (e.g., car radiators).
      • Processes where fluids must not exceed certain temperatures (e.g., to avoid overheating the cold fluid).
      • Educational or experimental setups due to simpler construction.
    • Common in basic tube-in-tube or shell-and-tube heat exchangers.

6. Advantages and Disadvantages

  • Counterflow:
    • 장점:
      • Higher thermal efficiency, reducing energy losses.
      • Smaller size for the same heat transfer capacity.
      • Better suited for applications with large temperature differences.
    • Disadvantages:
      • More complex design and piping, potentially increasing costs.
      • May require additional measures to manage condensation or frost in cold environments.
  • Parallel Flow:
    • 장점:
      • Simpler design, easier to manufacture and maintain.
      • Lower pressure drop in some cases, reducing pumping costs.
    • Disadvantages:
      • Lower efficiency, requiring larger heat transfer areas.
      • Limited by the outlet temperature constraint (cold fluid cannot exceed hot fluid’s outlet temperature).

7. Practical Considerations

  • Counterflow:
    • Ideal for energy recovery systems (e.g., Holtop’s 3D cross-counterflow exchangers with 95% efficiency or RECUTECH’s RFK+ enthalpy exchangers).
    • Often equipped with features like hydrophilic coatings to manage condensation (e.g., Eri Corporation’s aluminum plate exchangers).
  • Parallel Flow:
    • Used in applications where cost and simplicity outweigh efficiency needs, such as basic HVAC systems or small-scale industrial cooling.
    • Less common in modern high-efficiency designs due to performance limitations.

Summary Table

패널 룸에 간접 증발 냉각 장치 적용

Indirect evaporative cooling (IEC) units are increasingly used in electrical panel rooms, control rooms, and equipment enclosures to provide energy-efficient cooling without introducing additional humidity. These rooms typically house sensitive electrical and electronic equipment that generates heat during operation and requires a controlled temperature environment for reliable functioning.

Application of Cross Flow Heat Exchanger in Indirect Evaporative Cooling System of Data Center

패널 룸에 간접 증발 냉각 장치 적용

How It Works

An indirect evaporative cooling unit cools the air without direct contact between water and the air inside the panel room. Instead, it uses a 열교환 기 to transfer heat from the warm air inside the room to a secondary air stream that is cooled by evaporation. This process ensures that:

  • No moisture enters the panel room.

  • The internal air remains clean and dry.

  • Energy consumption is significantly lower than traditional mechanical refrigeration.

Benefits in Panel Room Applications

  1. Moisture-Free Cooling:
    Since no direct contact with water occurs, sensitive electrical components are safe from condensation and corrosion risks.

  2. Energy Efficiency:
    Compared to traditional air conditioning systems, IEC units consume less power, making them ideal for continuous operation in industrial settings.

  3. Reduced Maintenance:
    With fewer mechanical components and no refrigeration cycle, the system is simple to maintain and has a longer operational life.

  4. Improved Reliability:
    Maintaining a stable and cool environment helps prolong the life of control panels and reduces the risk of equipment failure caused by overheating.

  5. Environmentally Friendly:
    No refrigerants are used, reducing the system’s environmental impact.

Typical Applications

  • Electrical panel rooms in factories

  • Server and network control cabinets

  • Inverter or PLC (programmable logic controller) rooms

  • Outdoor telecom enclosures

  • Substation control rooms

산업용 열 회수 상자, 폐가스 및 열 회수, 가스-가스 열교환기

산업용 열 회수 장치는 다양한 산업 분야에서 폐가스 흐름으로부터 열을 회수하도록 설계된 작고 효율적인 시스템입니다. 가스-가스 열교환기를 사용하여 두 기류를 혼합하지 않고 고온의 배기 가스에서 유입되는 신선한 공기로 열에너지를 전달합니다. 이 공정은 추가 가열 필요성을 줄여 에너지 효율을 크게 향상시키고, 운영 비용과 환경 영향을 줄입니다.

알루미늄이나 스테인리스 스틸과 같은 내구성 있는 소재로 제작된 이 시스템은 고온 및 부식성 환경을 견딜 수 있습니다. 내부 열교환기는 주로 알루미늄 호일이나 판으로 제작되어 높은 열전도도와 효율적인 열 전달을 보장합니다. 이러한 설계는 오염된 배기 공기와 깨끗한 공급 공기 간의 교차 오염을 방지하여 식품 가공, 담배, 인쇄, 화학, 슬러지 처리 등의 산업에 적합합니다.

이 에너지 절약 솔루션은 폐열을 회수할 뿐만 아니라 실내 공기질을 개선하고 안정적인 생산 환경을 유지하는 데에도 도움을 줍니다. 설치 및 유지 보수가 간편한 산업용 열 회수 박스는 지속 가능성을 높이고 에너지 절약 규정을 준수하려는 공장에 현명한 선택입니다.

Industrial heat recovery box, waste gas and heat recovery, gas to gas heat exchanger

산업용 열 회수 상자, 폐가스 및 열 회수, 가스-가스 열교환기

how does a cross flow heat exchanger work

A crossflow heat exchanger works by allowing two fluids to flow at right angles (perpendicular) to each other, typically with one fluid flowing through tubes and the other flowing across the outside of the tubes. The key principle is that heat is transferred from one fluid to the other through the walls of the tubes. Here's a step-by-step breakdown of how it works:

Components:

  1. Tube Side: One of the fluids flows through the tubes.
  2. Shell Side: The other fluid flows over the tubes, across the tube bundle, in a direction perpendicular to the flow of the fluid inside the tubes.

Working Process:

  1. Fluid Inlet: Both fluids (hot and cold) enter the heat exchanger at different inlets. One fluid (let's say the hot fluid) enters through the tubes, and the other fluid (cold fluid) enters the space outside the tubes.
  2. Fluid Flow:

    • The fluid flowing inside the tubes moves in a straight or slightly twisted path.
    • The fluid flowing outside the tubes crosses over them in a perpendicular direction. The path of this fluid can be either crossflow (directly across the tubes) or have a more complex configuration, like a combination of crossflow and counterflow.

  3. Heat Transfer:

    • Heat from the hot fluid is transferred to the tube walls and then to the cold fluid flowing across the tubes.
    • The efficiency of heat transfer depends on the temperature difference between the two fluids. The larger the temperature difference, the more efficient the heat transfer.

  4. Outlet: After heat transfer, the now cooler hot fluid exits through one outlet, and the now warmer cold fluid exits through another outlet. The heat exchange process results in a temperature change in both fluids as they flow through the heat exchanger.

Design Variations:

  • Single-pass crossflow: One fluid flows in a single direction across the tubes, and the other fluid moves through the tubes.
  • Multi-pass crossflow: The fluid inside the tubes can flow in multiple passes to increase the contact time with the fluid outside, improving heat transfer.

Efficiency Considerations:

  • Crossflow heat exchangers are generally less efficient than counterflow heat exchangers because the temperature gradient between the two fluids decreases along the length of the heat exchanger. In counterflow, the fluids maintain a more consistent temperature difference, which makes it more effective for heat transfer.
  • However, crossflow heat exchangers are easier to design and are often used in situations where space is limited or where fluids need to be separated (like in air-to-air heat exchangers).

Applications:

  • Air-cooled heat exchangers (like in HVAC systems or car radiators).
  • Cooling of electronic equipment.
  • Heat exchangers for ventilation systems.

So, while not as thermally efficient as counterflow heat exchangers, crossflow designs are versatile and commonly used when simplicity or space-saving is important.

temperature profile for cross flow heat exchanger

Here’s a breakdown of the temperature profile for a cross flow heat exchanger, specifically when both fluids are unmixed:


🔥 Cross Flow Heat Exchanger – Both Fluids Unmixed

➤ Flow Arrangement:

  • One fluid flows horizontally (say, hot fluid in tubes).
  • The other flows vertically (say, cold air across the tubes).
  • No mixing within or between the fluids.


📈 Temperature Profile Description:

▪ Hot Fluid:

  • Inlet temperature: High.
  • As it flows, it loses heat to the cold fluid.
  • Outlet temperature: Lower than inlet, but not uniform across the exchanger due to varying contact time.

▪ Cold Fluid:

  • Inlet temperature: Low.
  • Gains heat as it flows across the hot tubes.
  • Outlet temperature: Higher, but also varies across the exchanger.

🌀 Because of the crossflow and no mixing:

  • Each point on the exchanger sees a different temperature gradient, depending on how long each fluid has been in contact with the surface.
  • The temperature distribution is nonlinear and more complex than in counterflow or parallel flow exchangers.


📊 Typical Temperature Profile (schematic layout):

                ↑ Cold fluid in

High │ ┌──────────────┐
Temp │ │ │
│ │ │ → Hot fluid in (right side)
│ │ │
↓ └──────────────┘
Cold fluid out ← Hot fluid out

⬇ Temperature Curves:

  • Cold fluid gradually heats up — the curve starts low and arcs upward.
  • Hot fluid cools down — starts high and arcs downward.
  • The curves are not parallel, and not symmetrical due to crossflow geometry and varying heat exchange rate.


🔍 Efficiency:

  • The effectiveness depends on the heat capacity ratio and the NTU (Number of Transfer Units).
  • Generally less efficient than counterflow but more efficient than parallel flow.

cross flow heat exchanger with both fluids unmixed

A cross flow heat exchanger with both fluids unmixed refers to a type of heat exchanger where two fluids (hot and cold) flow perpendicular (at 90°) to each other, and neither fluid mixes internally or with the other. This configuration is common in applications like air-to-air heat recovery or automotive radiators.

Key Features:

  • Cross flow: The two fluids move at right angles to each other.
  • Unmixed fluids: Both the hot and cold fluids are confined to their respective flow passages by solid walls or fins, preventing any mixing.
  • Heat transfer: Occurs across the solid wall or surface separating the fluids.

Construction:

Typically includes:

Enclosed channels for the second fluid (e.g., water or refrigerant) to flow inside the tubes.

Tubes or finned surfaces where one fluid (e.g., air) flows across the tubes.

Common Applications:

  • Radiators in cars
  • Air-conditioning systems
  • Industrial HVAC systems
  • Heat recovery ventilators (HRVs)

Advantages:

  • No contamination between fluids
  • Simple maintenance and cleaning
  • Good for gases and fluids that must remain separate

How does a counterflow heat exchanger work?

In the counterflow heat exchanger, two neighboring aluminum plates create channels for theair to pass through. The supply air passes on one side of the plate and the exhaust air onthe other. Airflows are passed by each other along parallel aluminum plates instead ofperpendicular like in a crossflow heat exchanger. The heat in the exhaust air is transferredthrough the plate from the warmer air to the colder air.
Sometimes, the exhaust air is contaminated with humidity and pollutants, but airflows nevermix with a plate heat exchanger, leaving the supply air fresh and clean.

Plate heat recovery exchanger made in china

Heat exchangers are mainly made of materials such as aluminum foil, stainless steel foil, or polymers. When there is a temperature difference between the airflow isolated by aluminum foil and flowing in opposite directions, heat transfer occurs, achieving energy recovery. By using an air to air heat exchanger, the heat in the exhaust can be utilized to preheat the fresh air, thereby achieving the goal of energy conservation. The heat exchanger adopts a unique point surface combination sealed process, which has a long service life, high temperature conductivity, no permeation, and no secondary pollution caused by the permeation of exhaust gas.

Plate heat recovery exchanger

산업용 열 재활용 빈 시리즈

메모:

          1. 배기온도가 200°C 이하인 산업폐기가스로부터 발생하는 열을 회수하여 신선한 공기를 가열할 수 있습니다.

          2. 열 재활용 상자의 구조는 현장 상황에 맞게 설계될 수 있습니다.

          3. 이 구조에는 급기장치나 배기장치가 없습니다.

          4. 이 표의 열 회수 효율은 공기 공급량과 배기량에 따른 값입니다. 공기 공급량과 배기량에 따른 열 회수 효율은 당사에 문의하시기 바랍니다.

          5. 열 회수 상자는 바닥형, 천장형 및 기타 구조형(일반 풍량 100000m3/h, 최대 풍량 3T/h)으로 제작할 수 있습니다.

도움이 필요하신가요?
ko_KR한국어